Table 3. Changes in WHC (%) of houndfish treated by DW, 1% AA, CTS 1, CTS 2, CTS 3, CTS 4 during ice storage

Samples Storage time (days)
0 4 8 12 16 20
DW 83.2 ± 1.62a 84.7 ± 0.67a 86.5 ± 1.56b 87.3 ± 0.88b 89.5 ± 1.56d 92.3 ± 0.33c
1% AA 82.3 ± 1.05a 83.7 ± 0.33a 85.2 ± 0.68ab 87.0 ± 0.83b 88.1 ± 0.72c 91.1 ± 3.67bc
CTS 1 82.8 ± 0.67a 83.2 ± 0.69a 83.5 ± 2.36a 84.8 ± 0.68a 87.0 ± 0.44bc 88.5 ± 0.33ab
CTS 2 82.1 ± 1.19a 83.1 ± 2.31a 83.4 ± 1.69a 84.7 ± 1.78a 86.1 ± 0.51ab 87.7 ± 0.87a
CTS 3 82.4 ± 0.46a 83.3 ± 1.80a 83.6 ± 1.68a 84.3 ± 0.91a 85.5 ± 1.66a 86.1 ± 0.87a
CTS 4 82.9 ± 1.68a 83.8 ± 2.36a 84.0 ± 1.00a 84.8 ± 1.10a 85.7 ± 0.35ab 87.6 ± 0.96a
Values are mean ± SD (n = 3).
Values with different superscripts within the same column are significantly different (p < 0.05).
DW, houndfish treated with distilled water; 1% AA, houndfish treated with 1% acetic acid; CTS 1, houndfish treated with 0.5% chitosan; CTS 2, houndfish treated with 1% chitosan; CTS 3, houndfish treated with 1.5% chitosan; CTS 4, houndfish treated with 2% chitosan.