Table 3. Changes in WHC (%) of houndfish treated by DW, 1% AA, CTS 1, CTS 2, CTS 3, CTS 4 during ice storage
Samples | Storage time (days) |
0 | 4 | 8 | 12 | 16 | 20 |
DW | 83.2 ± 1.62a | 84.7 ± 0.67a | 86.5 ± 1.56b | 87.3 ± 0.88b | 89.5 ± 1.56d | 92.3 ± 0.33c |
1% AA | 82.3 ± 1.05a | 83.7 ± 0.33a | 85.2 ± 0.68ab | 87.0 ± 0.83b | 88.1 ± 0.72c | 91.1 ± 3.67bc |
CTS 1 | 82.8 ± 0.67a | 83.2 ± 0.69a | 83.5 ± 2.36a | 84.8 ± 0.68a | 87.0 ± 0.44bc | 88.5 ± 0.33ab |
CTS 2 | 82.1 ± 1.19a | 83.1 ± 2.31a | 83.4 ± 1.69a | 84.7 ± 1.78a | 86.1 ± 0.51ab | 87.7 ± 0.87a |
CTS 3 | 82.4 ± 0.46a | 83.3 ± 1.80a | 83.6 ± 1.68a | 84.3 ± 0.91a | 85.5 ± 1.66a | 86.1 ± 0.87a |
CTS 4 | 82.9 ± 1.68a | 83.8 ± 2.36a | 84.0 ± 1.00a | 84.8 ± 1.10a | 85.7 ± 0.35ab | 87.6 ± 0.96a |
Values are mean ± SD (n = 3).
Values with different superscripts within the same column are significantly different (p < 0.05).
DW, houndfish treated with distilled water; 1% AA, houndfish treated with 1% acetic acid; CTS 1, houndfish treated with 0.5% chitosan; CTS 2, houndfish treated with 1% chitosan; CTS 3, houndfish treated with 1.5% chitosan; CTS 4, houndfish treated with 2% chitosan.