Table 3. df and the canonical relationship between TNM characters

TNM	df
TNM	1	2	3	4	5	6
R12	0.21	–0.45^*	0.00	0.32	–0.24	0.26
R11	–0.09	–0.37^*	–0.08	0.06	0.11	0.06
R2	–0.20	–0.37^*	0.06	0.29	0.12	–0.17
R10	–0.15	–0.32^*	–0.13	0.28	–0.00	0.20
R6	0.24	–0.37	0.47^*	–0.11	0.24	–0.23
R8	–0.17	0.15	0.31^*	0.23	–0.19	–0.08
R7	0.19	0.19	–0.44	0.48^*	0.28	0.08
R15	–0.30	–0.16	–0.16	0.43^*	–0.17	0.32
R13	0.23	–0.23	0.25	0.43^*	–0.31	0.25
R3	0.12	–0.07	0.29	0.08	–0.43^*	0.16
R9	0.03	0.27	–0.06	0.17	0.27^*	0.25
R4	–0.04	–0.25	0.37	0.33	–0.05	0.60^*
R5	–0.34	–0.04	0.11	–0.05	0.08	0.56^*
R1	0.09	0.38	–0.04	0.00	0.21	0.40^*
R14	–0.02	–0.33	0.15	0.21	–0.26	0.33^*
Eigenvalue	2.43	1.58	0.68	0.43	0.28	0.11
% of variance	43.9	28.6	12.4	7.9	5.2	2.1
Canonical correlation	0.84	0.78	0.63	0.55	0.47	0.32

df, discriminant function; TNM, truss network measurement.