Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences
The Korean Society of Fisheries and Aquatic Science
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Change in plasma cortisol and glucose levels of Oncorhynchus keta according to water temperature

Young Seok Seo1https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7411-9088, Hyo Bin Lee2https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1921-2746, Joo Hak Jeong1https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1077-7019, Seong Jun Mun1https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5261-5793, Han Kyu Lim2,*https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8522-9901
1Gyeongsangbuk-do Fisheries Resources Institute, Yeongdeok 36405, Korea
2Department of Biomedicine, Health & Life Convergence Sciences, BK21, Mokpo National University, Muan 58554, Korea
*Corresponding author: Han Kyu Lim, Department of Biomedicine, Health & Life Convergence Sciences, BK21, Mokpo National University, Muan 58554, Korea, Tel: +82-61-450-2395, Fax: +82-61-452-8875, E-mail:limhk@mokpo.ac.kr

Copyright © 2023 The Korean Society of Fisheries and Aquatic Science. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Received: Aug 03, 2022; Revised: Nov 15, 2022; Accepted: Dec 22, 2022

Published Online: Feb 28, 2023

Abstract

Chum salmon (Oncorhynchus keta) is a species of anadromous salmonid inhabiting coastal rivers in the North Pacific and the Arctic in the Bering and is the most widely distributed among Pacific salmon species. It is an important fish species in Korea as the salmon releasing project is being actively carried out. This study was conducted to investigate changes in the physiological activity of O. keta according to water temperature. Three experiments were conducted according to the water temperature and period, and the plasma concentrations of cortisol and glucose were analyzed from the blood samples of the experimental groups. Experiment I is a short-term water temperature experiment, in which water temperature stimulation was given for 4 hours at water temperatures of 12°C, 16°C (control), 20°C, and 24°C, and a recovery period was given for 4 hours. Experiment II is an experiment in which water temperature stimulation was given for 24 hours, 48 hours, and 72 hours at a high temperature of 24°C, and a recovery period was given for 12 hours, respectively. Experiment III is a long-term water temperature experiment, in which the water temperature was 12°C, 16°C (control), 20°C, and 24°C for 8 weeks. As a result of the experiment, in Experiment I, there was no significant difference in the survival rate between the experimental groups, but the concentration of cortisol and glucose in the plasma according to the set water temperature showed a significant difference. In Experiment II, there was no significant trend according to the maintenance time of the high-temperature state, but as the temperature increased, the plasma cortisol and glucose levels significantly increased compared to the control group. In Experiment III, all of the experimental group C (24°C) died in the 1st week, and there was no significant difference in the plasma glucose at the 1st and 8th weeks among the remaining experimental groups.

Keywords: Oncorhynchus keta; Heat stress; Glucose; Cortisol

Introduction

Chum salmon, Oncorhynchus keta belongs to the family Salmonidae and is one of eight species of Pacific salmonids in the genus Oncorhynchus. O. keta has the widest natural geographic and scattering distribution among Pacific salmonids, primarily because its range extends farther along the shores of the Arctic Ocean than other salmonids (Groot & Margolis, 1991). It has been documented to live from Korea and the Japanese island of Honshu, around the rim of the North Pacific Ocean, to Monterey bay in southern California. This species may historically have been the most abundant of all salmonids, Neave (1964) estimated that before the 1940s, O. keta contributed almost 50% of the total biomass of all salmonids in the Pacific Ocean.

Korea is one of the coastal countries where O. keta returns and is located in the southernmost part of the many countries where it returns. Since the 1970s in Korea, O. keta release projects have been actively conducted for the purpose of creating coastal fisheries resources on the east coast, and many studies have been reported on stocks classification (Jung et al., 2003; Kang et al., 2003; Kim et al., 2007), geographical distribution (Hong et al., 2020), and migration characteristics of O. keta (Kim et al., 2020).

The timing of seasonal changes in river flow and water temperatures is probably the most important factor in constructing the history of freshwater life of anadromous salmonids. However, the degree of change in temperature and precipitation within the distribution range of O. keta is not clear, and the environmental boundaries are still unclear (Johnson et al., 1997). The rearing water temperature for O. keta is stated to be preferred at 11.2°C to 14.6°C, and it has been reported that the appropriate water temperature is 13.5°C, and the upper lethal is 25.8°C (Beschta et al., 1987). In addition, O. keta is most consistently observed to spawn in the range of 7°C to 12.8°C (Beacham & Murray, 1986; Bjornn & Reiser, 1991; Hicks, 2002). In Elliott (1981), the lower critical range of O. keta was found to be 0°C to 7°C, and the upper critical range was found to be 22°C to 28°C, so it was confirmed that high-temperature resistance of O. keta was low among salmonid fish species. Brett (1952) reported that the lethal upper water temperature of O. keta fry is 23.7°C, and it was shown that a significant lethality was shown when continuously exposed at 22°C (Hicks, 2002). A study by Hicks (2002) recommended that the daily maximum temperature should not exceed 21°C to prevent mortality of O. keta.

Recently, fish mortality due to water temperature has been increasing, and abnormal weather conditions and heat stress are the main causal mechanisms for fish mortality (Fey et al., 2015). It is known that a combination of high-water temperatures, accelerated maturation and aging, increased stress, impaired ion regulation function, and disease are responsible for salmonid migration deaths (Hinch et al., 2012). Studies that have been observed so far have reported that water temperatures may threaten the life cycle of salmonid, given regional warming (Bowerman et al., 2016; Eliason et al., 2011; von Biela et al., 2021; Westley, 2020).

When the water temperature rises, the physiological activity of salmonids under water temperature stress is similar to that of other fish species. Cortisol is the most common glucocorticoid hormone in salmonid fish and has been frequently used as a measure of stress (Donaldson, 1981; Sadoul & Geffroy, 2019). The increase in blood cortisol concentration due to stress is initiated by the release of the hormone corticoid-releasing factor (CRF) from the hypothalamus. CRF stimulates the pituitary gland to release another hormone, adrenocorticotropin (ACTH). ACTH increases the level of the corticosteroid hormone in the plasma, which is released by the interrenal tissue of the kidneys (Fevolden et al., 1993; Sumpter et al., 1986). A rapid increase in cortisol levels due to short-term stress is easy to recover, but a long-term increase in cortisol levels may be immunosuppressive and have harmful effects (Fast et al., 2008; Pickering & Pottinger, 1985). In addition to an increase in blood cortisol levels in response to stress, glucose levels in fish also increase (Pottinger & Carrick, 1999). In the short term, high glucose levels are mainly mediated as a result of the rapid increase in blood catecholamines that occurs during the stress response (Mazeaud et al., 1977; Vijayan & Moon, 1994), and in the long term, it may be due to cortisol-dependent gluconeogenesis (Vijayan et al., 1997). Therefore, a comparison of blood cortisol and glucose levels as markers for stress response in fish involving salmonid has been used in many studies (Gallant et al., 2017; Jhingan et al., 2003; Martínez-Porchas et al., 2009; Tromp et al., 2018).

In this study, an experiment in which different water temperature stimulation was applied to O. keta according to water temperature and experiments inducing high temperature stress for each period was performed. Then, through hematological analysis, we tried to investigate the changes in plasma cortisol and glucose levels that differ according to water temperature conditions. Through analysis, the water temperature conditions in which stress is induced in O. keta were confirmed, and the water temperature fluctuation conditions suitable for breeding O. keta were established.

Materials and Methods

Ethical statement

All procedures were performed in accordance with guidelines for the ethical treatment of animals and were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Mokpo National University (no. 1183; December 17, 2013).

Experimental fish

All experiments were performed using artificially seeded salmon juvenile in Gyeongsangbuk-do Fisheries Resources Institute. The experimental fish were first acclimated to a water temperature of 16°C for 7 days and were fed twice a day at 9 am and 4 pm. Dissolved oxygen (DO) was maintained a level of 8 mg/L with liquid oxygen, and the water temperature was maintained with thermostat and controller. The size of the fish tank was ∅1.6 m × 0.6 m, the flow rate per minute was 11 L, and the flow rate per day was 13 turns.

Experiment I

Experiment I was a short-term experiment by water temperature. The mean length and body weight of O. keta (n = 168) was 27.8 ± 2.0 cm and 73.7 ± 13.0 g, respectively. The experimental fish were housed in three tanks containing 14 O. keta for each experimental group. The same water temperature as the natural water for O. keta during the experiment period, 16°C, was set as a negative control, and the experimental groups were set to 12°C, 20°C, and 24°C. All experimental groups started at 16°C and lowered or raised the water temperature for 2 hours to reach the set temperature for each group. The experimental groups gave water temperature stimulation for 4 hours at each water temperature, raising or lowering the water temperature again for 2 hours to 16°C, and then giving recovery time for 4 hours (Fig. 1). Even during the experimental period, DO was maintained at 8 mg/L or higher, and the water temperature was adjusted by thermostat and controller. During the experiment, feed was supplied twice a day, and the flow rate was the same as the acclimation period.

fas-26-2-117-g1
Fig. 1. The change in water temperature for each experimental group in Experiment I. The arrows indicate the time of blood sampling.
Download Original Figure
Experiment II

In Experiment II, a short-term experiment for each period was conducted on the water temperature judged to be critical in Experiment I. The mean length and body weight of O. keta (n = 160) was 21.4 ± 1.6 cm and 73.6 ± 15.5 g, respectively. The experimental fish were housed in three tanks containing 64 O. keta for each experimental group. The experimental groups started at 16°C and raised the water temperature for 2 hours to induce heat stress for 24 hours, 48 hours, and 72 hours, respectively, at a high temperature of 24°C. All experimental groups recovered for 12 hours after heat stress (Fig. 2). Even during the experiment period, DO, water temperature, feed supply, and flow rate were performed in the same way as in Experiment I.

fas-26-2-117-g2
Fig. 2. The change in water temperature for each experimental group in Experiment II. The arrows indicate the time of blood sampling.
Download Original Figure
Experiment III

Experiment III was a long-term experiment by water temperature, which gave long-term water temperature stimulation for 8 weeks at the water temperatures set in Experiment I. The mean length and body weight of O. keta (n = 240) was 22.6 ± 0.9 cm and 97.9 ± 14.2 g, respectively. The experimental fish were housed in three tanks containing 60 O. keta for each experimental group. Similar to Experiment I, 16°C, the same water temperature as natural water, was set as a negative control, and the experimental groups were 12°C, 20°C, and 24°C. All experimental groups started at 16°C and lowered or raised the water temperature for 2 hours to reach the set temperature for each group and were reared at the water temperature for 8 weeks (Fig. 3). Even during the experimental period, DO was maintained at 8 mg/L or higher, and the water temperature was adjusted by thermostat and controller. During the experiment period, the feed was supplied twice a day. Feed amount was measured from the start to the end of the experiment, and the total length and weight of the experimental fish were measured at 0.1 cm and 0.1 g, respectively, using vernier calipers and an electronic scale.

fas-26-2-117-g3
Fig. 3. The change in water temperature for each experimental group in Experiment III. The arrows indicate the time of blood sampling.
Download Original Figure
Heat stress and sample collection

Fish were anesthetized with 20 mg/L tricaine methane sulfonate (MS-222, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) before blood samples were collected. Blood samples were obtained from the caudal vein of fish from each tank using 23 G syringes with heparin sodium, respectively. Blood samples were centrifuged at 1,000×g for 10 min. Plasma was collected and stored at −80°C until analysis.

Experiment I

In order to investigate the survival rate of fish, the survival of turned over the body was checked at intervals of 2 hours. Blood sampling was performed at the start of the experiment, immediately after stimulation, at the 2nd hour of stimulation, at the 4th hour of stimulation, at the start of recovery, at the 2nd hour of recovery, and at the 4th hour of recovery, respectively.

Experiment II

Survival rate surveys were performed in the same method as in Experiment I. Blood sampling was performed at the start of the experiment, immediately after stimulation, and every 12 hours after stimulation in all experimental groups. And blood sampling was performed at 1 hour and 12 hours after recovery after the 24 hours, 48 hours, and 72 hours of water temperature stimulation, respectively. All experimental groups were conducted simultaneously to reduce the variables, and the experiments were terminated in chronological order.

Experiment III

In order to investigate the survival rate of fish, the survival of turned over the body was checked at intervals of 24 hours. Blood sampling was performed immediately after the start of the experiment and after 8 weeks in all experimental groups.

Plasma analysis

All the experimental samples of Experiment I, Experiment II, and Experiment III were analyzed for plasma cortisol and glucose levels in the following way. The plasma levels of cortisol were measured using a Fish Cortisol ELISA kit (MyBioSource, San Diego, CA, USA), and all plasma samples were analyzed in duplicate. For the assay, 50 μL of fish plasma sample and 50 μL of the standard solution were added per well. 50 μL of the antibody-horseradish peroxidase-conjugate solution was added to each well except blank, and mixed well, incubated for 1 hour at 37°C. Then, the solution of each well was removed and washed three times with 250 μL of 1X wash buffer. 50 μL of substrate A and 50 μL of substrate B solution were added to each well and incubated for 15 min at 37°C. After adding 50 μL of stop solution, determined the optical density (OD) of each well within 5 min, using a SpectraMax 190 microplate reader (Molecular Devices, San Jose, CA, USA) set to 450 nm. The standard curve was constructed, and the concentration of samples can be determined by regression analysis.

Plasma levels of glucose were measured using a Glucose Assay Kit (MyBioSource). 50 μL of each glucose standard and plasma sample was added per well, and 50 μL of reaction mix solution was added to each well. Then, incubated for 40 min at 37°C protected from light. After incubation, the absorbance was measured using a microplate reader in the 540–570 nm range. The concentration of glucose within samples was calculated by comparing the sample OD to the standard curve. In Experiment I, the inter-assay coefficients of variability (CV) of cortisol assay was 0.6%–13.4% while intra-assay CV was 0.7%–6.7%, and the inter-assay CV of glucose assay was 0.5%–12.2% while intra-assay CV was 0.4%–8.3%. In Experiment II, the inter-assay CV of cortisol assay was 0.2%–11.7% while intra-assay CV was 0.5%–9.6%, and the inter-assay CV of glucose assay was 1.2%–8.5% while intra-assay CV was 0.4%–6.9%. In Experiment III, the inter-assay CV of cortisol assay was 0.2%–11.7% while intra-assay CV was 2.2%–13.7%, and the inter-assay CV of glucose assay was 1.2%–15.4% while intra-assay CV was 0.8%–8.4%.

Statistics analysis

The measurements obtained from the experiment were expressed as the mean ± SE, and the significance of differences among the treatment groups was performed using one-way analysis of variance and Duncan’s multiple range test (p < 0.05), and Student’s t-test with SPSS software (version 24; IBM, Armonk, NY, USA).

Results

Survival rate
Experiment I

The cumulative survival rates of the experimental groups of Experiment I are shown that all experimental groups had a 100% survival rate during the experiment period (data not shown).

Experiment II

The cumulative survival rates of the experimental groups of Experiment II are shown in Fig. 4. The control group showed a survival rate of 100% during the experiment period, and group A, which was given a high temperature of 24°C for 24 hours, showed a survival rate of 90% at 24 hours after the stimulation was finished. And the survival rate during the recovery period was 85%. Group B, which was given a high temperature of 24°C for 48 hours, showed a survival rate of 93.9% at 36 hours after the stimulation and 88.3% at 48 hours. The survival rate during the subsequent recovery period was 83.3%. Group C, which had been subjected to high-temperature stress at 24°C for 72 hours, started to decrease survival rate from 36 hours after the stimulation and showed a survival rate of 95% at 72 hours. After that, the survival rate during the recovery period was 91.7%.

fas-26-2-117-g4
Fig. 4. The survival rate of experimental groups in Experiment II. a,b The lowercase letters indicate the significance according to the experimental time of each experimental group during the entire experiment period.
Download Original Figure
Experiment III

The cumulative survival rate of Experiment III is shown in Fig. 5. The control group had a survival rate of 100% during the 8 weeks of the experiment. In group A, which maintained the water temperature of 12°C for 8 weeks, the survival rate decreased to 98.3% from the 3rd week, and the cumulative survival rate was 93.3% at the 8th week when the experiment was finished. In group B, which maintained the water temperature of 20°C for 8 weeks, the survival rate decreased to 98.3% from the 2nd week and gradually decreased. At 8 weeks after the end of the experiment, the survival rate was 90%. In group C, which was housed at a water temperature of 24°C for 8 weeks, 90% of the experimental fish died in the first week of raising the water temperature. All of them died in the second week of the experiment. Table 1 shows the initial body weight, final body weight, the percent of weight gain, daily growth rate, feed efficiency, daily food intake rate, and condition factor of each experimental group. In the case of group C, it could not be included in Table 1 due to total mortality.

fas-26-2-117-g5
Fig. 5. The survival rate of experimental groups in Experiment III. a,bThe lowercase letters indicate the significance according to the experimental time of each experimental group during the entire experiment period.
Download Original Figure
Table 1. Growth performance of experimental groups in Experiment III during the experiment
Experimental groups Group A (12°C) Control (16°C) Group B (20°C)
Initial body weight (g) 95.95 ± 0.84 98.68 ± 1.56 95.37 ± 0.21
Final body weight (g) 147.64 ± 2.10b 170.44 ± 4.98a 135.82 ± 0.33c
Weight gain (%) 53.85 ± 0.85b 65.93 ± 2.33a 42.42 ± 0.66c
Specific growth rate (%) 0.69 ± 0.01b 0.82 ± 0.02a 0.57 ± 0.01c
Feed efficiency (%) 51.58 ± 2.82a 60.94 ± 2.56a 26.68 ± 1.82b
Daily feed intake (%) 1.27 ± 0.02c 1.47 ± 0.04b 1.57 ± 0.001a
Condition factor 0.89 ± 0.01c 0.97 ± 0.003a 0.95 ± 0.0001b

The values are mean ± SE (n = 240).

Weight gain: (final body weight – initial body weight) / initial body weight × 100; specific growth rate: [ln(final body weight) – ln(initial body weight)] / days reared × 100; feed efficiency: (wet weight gain / feed intake) × 100; daily feed intake: F / [(initial body weight + final body weight + dead fish weight) × days reared / 2] × 100; condition factor: (final body weight / total length3) × 100.

Means within each item followed by the same alphabetic letter are not significantly different (p > 0.05).

Download Excel Table
Plasma levels
Experiment I

The cortisol concentrations in the plasma of Experiment I are shown in Fig. 6. The control group maintained at 16°C showed no significant change in plasma cortisol concentration during the experimental period. Group A, which lowered the water temperature to 12°C and maintained it for 4 hours, showed the highest cortisol concentration of 6.79 ± 0.26 ng/mL at 6 hours after the end of the water temperature stimulation. However, there was no significant difference in the remaining sections except before the start of the experiment. In group B, where the water temperature was raised to 20°C and maintained for 4 hours, the plasma cortisol concentration increased rapidly immediately after raising the water temperature, and the highest concentration of 9.01 ± 0.06 ng/mL was found at 8 hours after the experiment started when the water temperature was lowered again to 16°C. As in group A, there were no significant differences in the remaining sections except before the start of the experiment. In group C, where the water temperature was raised to 24°C and water temperature stimulation was given for 4 hours, the plasma cortisol concentration rapidly increased after raising the water temperature, and it was significantly higher values of 9.60 ± 0.38 ng/mL and 9.66 ± 0.44 ng/mL at 2 hours and 4 hours after the water temperature stimulation (4 hours and 6 hours after the experiment elapsed). Thereafter, the plasma cortisol concentration gradually decreased during the recovery time.

fas-26-2-117-g6
Fig. 6. Changes in plasma cortisol concentration of the experimental groups according to the elapsed time of the experiment in Experiment I. A–DCapital letters indicate the significance between the experimental groups at the same sampling time, and a–clowercase letters indicate the significance according to the experimental time of each experimental group during the entire experiment period.
Download Original Figure

The plasma glucose levels of Experiment I are shown in Fig. 7. The control group showed the highest glucose level of 99.32 ± 0.87 mg/dL in the plasma at 12 hours after the experiment, but there was no significant difference from other periods. In group A, the highest plasma glucose level of 98.90 ± 1.44 mg/dL was seen 6 hours after the 12°C of water temperature stimulation was finished, and there was no significant difference from the rest of the periods except before the start of the experiment. In group B, the highest glucose level of 108.91 ± 3.11 mg/dL in the plasma was found at the 6th hour after the 20°C of water temperature stimulation for 4 hours. It was found that it decreased significantly to 98.27 ± 1.83 mg/dL at 12 hours after the experiment, which is the 4th hour of recovery. Group C showed the significantly highest glucose levels of 119.63 ± 1.79 mg/dL and 118.96 ± 1.74 mg/dL at 2 and 4 hours of recovery after the 24°C water temperature stimulation was finished.

fas-26-2-117-g7
Fig. 7. Changes in plasma glucose concentration of the experimental groups according to the elapsed time of the experiment in Experiment I. A–CCapital letters indicate the significance between the experimental groups at the same sampling time, and a–clowercase letters indicate the significance according to the experimental time of each experimental group during the entire experiment period.
Download Original Figure
Experiment II

The change in the plasma cortisol concentration in Experiment II is shown in Fig. 8. In group A, which was given a high temperature of 24°C for 24 hours, the concentration of cortisol in the plasma increased significantly to 7.94 ± 0.12 ng/mL at the 2nd hour immediately after the water temperature was raised, and the highest concentration of 8.81 ± 0.34 ng/mL was shown at the 13 hours after the experiment. Thereafter, it gradually decreased at 25 hours after the end of the water temperature stimulation, but the cortisol concentration was found to be significantly higher than that of the control group. Thereafter, the concentration decreased to 4.34 ± 1.34 ng/mL and 5.53 ± 0.14 ng/mL at the recovery time of 27 and 39 hours, and there was no significant difference with the control group. The plasma cortisol concentration of group B maintained at 24°C of high temperature for 48 hours, started to increase significantly after raising the water temperature, and showed significantly higher values of 8.17 ± 0.60 ng/mL and 7.92 ± 0.85 ng/mL at 13 and 25 hours after experiment elapsed. However, the concentration decreased sharply from the 37 hours, and there was no significant difference with the control group during the recovery time after the water temperature stimulation was finished. In group C, the high temperature of 24°C was maintained for 72 hours, and the plasma cortisol concentration showed a significantly higher value of 8.29 ± 0.63 ng/mL at the 13 hours after the experiment elapsed, and then gradually decreased. There was no significant difference from the control group in the remaining sections except for the 13 and 73 hours.

fas-26-2-117-g8
Fig. 8. Changes in plasma cortisol concentration of the experimental groups according to the elapsed time of the experiment in Experiment II. a–cLowercase letters indicate the significance of each experimental group according to the experimental time during the entire experimental period. *Asterisks indicate significance between the control and each experimental group at the same time.
Download Original Figure

Changes in plasma glucose level in Experiment II are shown in Fig. 9. The plasma glucose levels of group A were significantly increased compared to the control group at the 2 hours after the experiment elapsed and showed the highest value of 201.25 ± 27.21 mg/dL at the 13 hours. At 25 hours after the end of the water temperature stimulation, there was no significant difference with the control group. However, it increased again after the recovery started, showing a significantly higher glucose level of 179.35 ± 24.65 mg/dL in the plasma than in the control group. After 4 hours of recovery, it decreased again. The plasma glucose levels of group B increased rapidly at the 13th hour of the experiment, showing a significantly higher value of 203.01 ± 32.43 mg/dL than that of the control group. Thereafter, it decreased, but increased significantly compared to the control group at 49 hours after the end of the water temperature stimulation and at 2 hours after recovery. At 4 hours of recovery, it decreased again and did not show a significant difference from the control group. The plasma glucose levels of group C started to increase significantly at 2 hours after water temperature stimulation and showed significantly higher values of 200.96 ± 7.58 mg/dL and 273.13 ± 16.75 mg/dL than that of the control group at 13 and 37 hours after the start of the experiment. Thereafter, it decreased and there was no significant difference compared to the control group.

fas-26-2-117-g9
Fig. 9. Changes in plasma glucose concentration of the experimental groups according to the elapsed time of the experiment in Experiment II. a–dLowercase letters indicate the significance of each experimental group according to the experimental time during the entire experimental period. *Asterisks indicate significance between the control and each experimental group at the same time.
Download Original Figure
Experiment III

The plasma cortisol concentration in Experiment III is shown in Fig. 10. Group A, which was housed for 8 weeks at a water temperature of 12°C, showed a significantly higher cortisol concentration than the control group after 8 weeks (5.69 ± 0.42 ng/mL). In group B, which was maintained at 20°C for 8 weeks, the plasma cortisol concentration after 8 weeks was not significantly different from group A but was significantly higher than that of the control group (6.12 ± 0.37 ng/mL). In group C, 90% had already died in the first week of raising the water temperature to 24°C, so plasma analysis could not be performed.

fas-26-2-117-g10
Fig. 10. Changes in plasma cortisol concentration of the experimental groups according to the elapsed time of the experiment in Experiment III. A,BCapital letters indicate the significance between experimental groups in the same interval. n.d, not detected.
Download Original Figure

The plasma glucose levels of Experiment III are shown in Fig. 11. There was no significant difference in all experimental groups after 8 weeks.

fas-26-2-117-g11
Fig. 11. Changes in plasma glucose concentration of the experimental groups according to the elapsed time of the experiment in Experiment III. n.d, not detected.
Download Original Figure

Discussion

O. keta showed a 100% survival rate in all experimental groups in Experiment I, a short-term water temperature experiment, so it was judged that the water temperature stimulation for 4 hours did not affect the survival of O. keta. However, in the plasma analysis, in the case of the 20°C and 24°C experimental groups (group B, C), the plasma cortisol concentration increased rapidly immediately after the water temperature stimulation, and during 4 hours of stimulation, these two experimental groups showed significantly higher values than the control group, showing a stress response to the water temperature increase. It was confirmed in the case of group A with a water temperature of 12°C, there was no significant difference in plasma cortisol concentration from that of the control group. The change in plasma glucose concentration showed the highest value in group C, which was subjected to water temperature stimulation at 24°C for 4 hours from the start of water temperature stimulation to recovery time. When fish are faced with a stressful environment, the primary endocrine response involves the rapid release of stress hormones, catecholamines, and cortisol into circulation (Barton, 2002). Cortisol is released from interrenal tissues located in the head kidney in response to various pituitary hormones (Iwama, 1998). In particular, the adrenocorticotropic hormone, ACTH strongly stimulates the production of cortisol. The secreted cortisol activates several metabolic pathways that cause alterations in hematology. Among them, it is a kind of glucocorticoid hormone, which causes glycogen to be secreted from the fish liver through the blood to release glucose (Mommsen et al., 1999). This is a secondary response to stress, in order to cope with the energy demand required by the stress for the animal to cope with it metabolically. Glucose production serves as an energy substrate for tissues such as the brain, gill, and muscle to cope with the energy demands equivalent to stress (Costas et al., 2008). Cortisol has been shown to increase glucose production in fish by inducing both gluconeogenesis and glycogenolysis and is known to play an important role in stress-related plasma glucose concentrations (Faught & Vijayan, 2016). Measuring cortisol concentration has been used as an excellent approach to assessing the effectiveness of a given stressor on fish (Sadoul & Geffroy, 2019). It has been successfully applied in various studies to evaluate the stress level of salmonids according to the water temperature (Basu et al., 2001; Fevolden et al., 1993; Palmisano et al., 2000). In this study, the plasma cortisol concentration of group C, the 24°C of water temperature stimulation experimental group of Experiment I, increased significantly immediately after stimulation, and the plasma glucose concentration also increased after stimulation, showing the highest value at the end of stimulation. These results indicate that cortisol secretion was activated as a primary stress response due to the increase in water temperature, and the activated cortisol increased plasma glucose levels.

In Experiment II, there was no significant difference in the difference in survival rate among the experimental groups except for the control group, indicating that there was no effect on the survival rate according to time at a high temperature of 24°C. In Fig. 4, the reason why the survival rate according to water temperature was higher in group C than in other group A and group B may be the difference between individuals who included healthy individuals in the tanks, or they adapted to a water temperature of 24°C for 3 days. As a result of the analysis of plasma cortisol concentration, all experimental groups were significantly higher than the control group at 12 hours of stimulation, and cortisol concentration decreased during 12 hours of recovery, indicating that cortisol secretion was activated at the beginning of the experiment due to stress caused by water temperature. The plasma glucose concentration of all experimental groups except the control group showed the same pattern as the cortisol concentration and increased until the 12th hour of stimulation and gradually decreased during the recovery period. In studies in which high-temperature stress was applied to O. keta, 50% of the fish died within 1 minute when the fish was moved from 15.6°C to 26.7°C, and 100% mortality on 15 seconds with a transfer from 15.6°C to 32.2°C (Snyder & Blahm, 1971). These studies investigated the mortality rate by giving high-temperature shock in a short time to O. keta, and it is thought that different results in survival rate were obtained because the water temperature setting in our study was not sharp and the water temperature was raised slowly while the fish was housed.

In Experiment III, which was reared for 8 weeks by water temperature, all fish of the experimental group C at 24°C died while raising the water temperature, and there was no significant difference in survival rate between the control group and the experimental groups at 12°C and 20°C. There was no significant difference in the plasma cortisol concentration of the experimental groups in Experiment III at week 1, and at week 8, groups A and B were significantly higher than the control group, and there was no significant difference in glucose concentration in all groups. As a result, it is judged that the water temperature of 12°C and 20°C is the water temperature to which chum salmon can adapt in the long term. The standard of 15°C weekly average temperature can be seen as the upper temperature of the temperature conditions that provide suitable rearing conditions for O. keta juvenile (Beschta et al., 1987; Brett, 1952; Hicks, 2002). However, recently, many studies have been conducted on heat adaptation and plasticity of cold-water fish species (Drinan et al., 2012; Whitney et al., 2014), and if there is an adaptation period of a certain period, it is judged that they can adapt to the water temperature of 12°C or 20°C without being affected by water temperature fluctuations.

In this study, a hematological analysis of O. keta according to water temperature and period was performed. Water temperature fluctuations from 16°C to 12°C in short-term water temperature stimulation did not appear to have any effect on O. keta. It was judged that the water temperature fluctuations to 20°C and 24°C showed a stress response according to the water temperature as plasma cortisol and glucose concentrations increased. In the experiment during the period at high temperature, plasma cortisol and glucose increased after stimulation in all experimental groups except the control group, and then decreased during the recovery period, and there was no significant difference according to the stimulation period. In the case of long-term water temperature stimulation for 8 weeks, the water temperature of 24°C died within 1 week, and the water temperature of 24°C was judged to be fatal for O. keta. Water temperature fluctuations to 12°C and 20°C increased only the plasma cortisol concentration and there was no significant difference in glucose concentration, suggesting that the adaptation mechanism could be shown during the 8 weeks. It is judged that the water temperature fluctuation suitable for breeding O. keta is between 12°C and 20°C, and it is thought that it is necessary to pay attention to the high temperature of 24°C or more when breeding in summer at the aquaculture industry. The results of this study can be used as basic data on the water temperature of O. keta, the most abundant salmonid in Korea.

Competing interests

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Funding sources

Not applicable.

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Availability of data and materials

Upon reasonable request, the datasets of this study can be available from the corresponding author.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All procedures were performed in accordance with the guidelines for the ethical treatment of animals and were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Mokpo National University No. 1183 (December 17, 2013).

References

1.

Barton BA. Stress in fishes: a diversity of responses with particular reference to changes in circulating corticosteroids. Integr Comp Biol. 2002; 42:517-25

2.

Basu N, Nakano T, Grau EG, Iwama GK. The effects of cortisol on heat shock protein 70 levels in two fish species. Gen Comp Endocrinol. 2001; 124:97-105

3.

Beacham TD, Murray CB. Comparative developmental biology of chum salmon (Oncorhynchus keta) from the Fraser River, British Columbia. Can J Fish Aquat Sci. 1986; 43:252-62

4.

Beschta RL, Bilby RE, Brown GW, Holtby LB, Hofstra TD. Stream temperature and aquatic habitat: fisheries and forestry interactions.In In: Salo EO, Cundy TW, editors.editors Streamside management: forestry and fisheries interactions. Seattle, WA: University of Washington. 1987; p p. 191-232.

5.

Bjornn TC, Reiser DW. Habitat requirements of salmonids in streams. Am Fish Soc Spec Publ. 1991; 19:83-138.

6.

Bowerman T, Keefer ML, Caudill CC. Pacific salmon prespawn mortality: patterns, methods, and study design considerations. Fish Mag. 2016; 41:738-49

7.

Brett JR. Temperature tolerance in young Pacific salmon, genus Oncorhynchus. J Fish Board Can. 1952; 9:265-323

8.

Costas B, Aragão C, Mancera JM, Dinis MT, Conceição LEC. High stocking density induces crowding stress and affects amino acid metabolism in Senegalese sole Solea senegalensis (Kaup 1858) juveniles. Aquac Res. 2008; 39:1-9

9.

Donaldson EM. The pituitary-interrenal axis as an indicator of stress in fish. Stress Fish. 1981; :11-47.

10.

Drinan DP, Zale AV, Webb MAH, Taper ML, Shepard BB, Kalinowski ST. Evidence of local adaptation in westslope cutthroat trout. Trans Am Fish Soc. 2012; 141:872-80

11.

Eliason EJ, Clark TD, Hague MJ, Hanson LM, Gallagher ZS, Jeffries KM, et al. Differences in thermal tolerance among sockeye salmon populations. Science. 2011; 332:109-12

12.

Elliott JM. Some aspects of thermal stress on fresh-water teleosts. Stress Fish. 1981; :209-45.

13.

Fast MD, Hosoya S, Johnson SC, Afonso LOB. Cortisol response and immune-related effects of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar Linnaeus) subjected to short- and long-term stress. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2008; 24:194-204

14.

Faught E, Vijayan MM. Mechanisms of cortisol action in fish hepatocytes. Comp Biochem Physiol B Biochem Mol Biol. 2016; 199:136-45

15.

Fevolden SE, Refstie T, Gjerde B. Genetic and phenotypic parameters for cortisol and glucose stress response in Atlantic salmon and rainbow trout. Aquaculture. 1993; 118:205-16

16.

Fey SB, Siepielski AM, Nusslé S, Cervantes-Yoshida K, Hwan JL, Huber ER, et al. Recent shifts in the occurrence, cause, and magnitude of animal mass mortality events. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2015; 112:1083-8

17.

Gallant MJ, LeBlanc S, MacCormack TJ, Currie S. Physiological responses to a short-term, environmentally realistic, acute heat stress in Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar. FACETS. 2017; 2:330-41

18.

Groot G, Margolis L. Pacific salmon life histories. Vancouver, BC: UBC Press. 1991.

19.

Hicks M. Evaluating standards for protecting aquatic life in Washington’s surface water quality standards temperature criteria draft discussion paper and literature summary [Internet]. Department of Ecology State of Washington 2002.[cited 2022 Nov 11]https://apps.ecology.wa.gov/publications/SummaryPages/0010070.html.

20.

Hinch SG, Cooke SJ, Farrell AP, Miller KM, Lapointe M, Patterson DA. Dead fish swimming: a review of research on the early migration and high premature mortality in adult Fraser river sockeye salmon Oncorhynchus nerka. J Fish Biol. 2012; 81:576-99

21.

Hong D, Seong KB, Ko EJ, Jung E, Jo H, Joo GJ. The distribution and migration boundary lines of Oncorhynchus keta in the Milyang river. Korean J Ecol Environ. 2020; 53:445-52

22.

Iwama GK. Stress in fish. Ann NY Acad Sci. 1998; 851:304-10

23.

Jhingan E, Devlin RH, Iwama GK. Disease resistance, stress response and effects of triploidy in growth hormone transgenic coho salmon. J Fish Biol. 2003; 63:806-23

24.

Johnson OW, Grant WS, Kope RG, Neely KG, Waknitz FW, Waples RS. Status review of chum salmon from Washington, Oregon, and California [Internet]. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration 1997.[cited 2022 Nov 11]https://repository.library.noaa.gov/view/noaa/3029.

25.

Jung W, Lee YH, Kim S, Jin DH, Seong KB. Genetic identification of the North Pacific chum salmon (Oncorhynchus keta) stocks. Korean J Fish Aquat Sci. 2003; 36:578-85

26.

Kang S, Kim S, Telmer K, Welch D, Helle JH, Lee YH, et al. Identification of stocks and environmental characteristics of North Pacific chum salmon, Oncorhynchus keta, by chemical analysis of otolith. In 2003 International Workshop on Application of Stock Identification in Defining Marine Distribution and Migration of Salmon. 2003; Honolulu, HI, USA p:37-8.

27.

Kim BS, Jung YW, Jung HK, Park JM, Lee CH, Lee CI. Behavior patterns during upstream migration of chum salmon (Oncorhynchus keta) in the lower reaches of Yeon-gok stream in Eastern Korea. J Environ Sci Int. 2020; 29:885-905

28.

Kim GE, Lee YH, Kang G, Kim C, Jung W, Seong KB, et al. Genetic diversity and population structure of chum salmon in the North Pacific.In Proceedings of the 2005 NPAFC-PICES Joint Symposium on the Status of Pacific Salmon and Their Role in North Pacific Marine Ecosystems. 2005; Jeju, Korea. p p. 203-9.

29.

Martínez-Porchas M, Martínez-Córdova LR, Ramos-Enriquez R. Cortisol and glucose: reliable indicators of fish stress?. Pan-Am J Aquat Sci. 2009; :158-78.

30.

Mazeaud MM, Mazeaud F, Donaldson EM. Primary and secondary effects of stress in fish: some new data with a general review. Trans Am Fish Soc. 1977; 106:201-12

31.

Mommsen TP, Vijayan MM, Moon TW. Cortisol in teleosts: dynamics, mechanisms of action, and metabolic regulation. Rev Fish Biol Fish. 1999; 9:211-68

32.

Neave F. Ocean migrations of Pacific salmon. J Fish Res Board Can. 1964; 21:1227-44

33.

Palmisano AN, Winton JR, Dickhoff WW. Tissue-specific induction of Hsp90 mRNA and plasma cortisol response in chinook salmon following heat shock, seawater challenge, and handling challenge. Mar Biotechnol. 2000; 2:329-38

34.

Pickering AD, Pottinger TG. Cortisol can increase the susceptibility of brown trout, Salmo trutta L., to disease without reducing the white blood cell count. J Fish Biol. 1985; 27:611-9

35.

Pottinger TG, Carrick TR. A comparison of plasma glucose and plasma cortisol as selection markers for high and low stress-responsiveness in female rainbow trout. Aquaculture. 1999; 175:351-63

36.

Sadoul B, Geffroy B. Measuring cortisol, the major stress hormone in fishes. J Fish Biol. 2019; 94:540-55

37.

Snyder GR, Blahm TH. Effects of increased temperature on cold-water organisms. J Water Pollut Control Fed. 1971; 43:890-9.

38.

Sumpter JP, Dye HM, Benfey TJ. The effects of stress on plasma ACTH, α-MSH, and cortisol levels in salmonid fishes. Gen Comp Endocrinol. 1986; 62:377-85

39.

Tromp JJ, Jones PL, Brown MS, Donald JA, Biro PA, Afonso LOB. Chronic exposure to increased water temperature reveals few impacts on stress physiology and growth responses in juvenile Atlantic salmon. Aquaculture. 2018; 495:196-204

40.

Vijayan MM, Moon TW. The stress response and the plasma disappearance of corticosteroid and glucose in a marine teleost, the sea raven. Can J Zool. 1994; 72:379-86

41.

Vijayan MM, Pereira C, Grau EG, Iwama GK. Metabolic responses associated with confinement stress in tilapia: the role of cortisol. Comp Biochem Physiol C Comp Pharmacol Toxicol Endocrinol. 1997; 116:89-95

42.

von Biela VR, Sergeant CJ, Carey MP, Liller Z, Russell C, Quinn-Davidson S, et al. Premature mortality observations among Alaska’s Pacific salmon during record heat and drought in 2019. Fish Mag. 2021; 47:157-68

43.

Westley PAH. Documentation of en route mortality of summer chum salmon in the Koyukuk river, Alaska and its potential linkage to the heatwave of 2019. Ecol Evol. 2020; 10:10296-304

44.

Whitney CK, Hinch SG, Patterson DA. Population origin and water temperature affect development timing in embryonic sockeye salmon. Trans Am Fish Soc. 2014; 143:1316-29